Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the implantation of a stent or valve in an indoor patient during a surgical procedure in a hospital involves a sale under section 2(ac) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 and is consequently taxable.
Analysis: The transaction was examined as a composite arrangement for medical treatment, not as a contract for sale of goods. The deeming fiction in Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India was held inapplicable because hospital services do not fall within the categories of deemed sale. The substance of the transaction was the performance of a medical procedure, and the implantation of the stent or valve was only an intrinsic and integral part of that procedure. The mere recovery of charges in the bill, including the cost of drugs and consumables, did not convert the medical procedure into a sale. The Court applied the principle that, outside the transactions covered by Article 366(29-A), a sale can be found only if the parties intended separate rights arising from a sale of goods.
Conclusion: The implantation of a stent or valve in the course of hospital treatment does not amount to a sale within section 2(ac) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, and the tax demand on that basis was unsustainable.