Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether credit was admissible on welding electrodes, D.A. gas, calibration gas and boric acid used for repair and maintenance of machinery; (ii) whether credit was admissible on iron and steel items such as channels, angles and plain plates used for fabrication and replacement of plant components; (iii) whether credit was admissible on electrical items, tyres and tubes, wire rope, jointing sheet, leak repair clamp and pneumatic cylinders; and (iv) whether credit could be taken on the original copy of invoice and on goods covered by the declaration requirement.
Issue (i): Whether credit was admissible on welding electrodes, D.A. gas, calibration gas and boric acid used for repair and maintenance of machinery.
Analysis: The denial of credit on these items was treated as settled against the assessee by Larger Bench decisions holding that welding electrodes and D.A. gas used for repair and maintenance do not qualify for credit. The same approach was applied to calibration gas and boric acid used for the same purpose.
Conclusion: Credit was not admissible and the denial was upheld, against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether credit was admissible on iron and steel items such as channels, angles and plain plates used for fabrication and replacement of plant components.
Analysis: These items were used for fabrication of components and parts of the plant that were in turn used to replace old and worn-out parts. The issue was treated as settled in favour of credit in the assessee's own case, and that view was followed.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether credit was admissible on electrical items, tyres and tubes, wire rope, jointing sheet, leak repair clamp and pneumatic cylinders.
Analysis: Electrical items used for running the plant were treated as eligible for credit. Tyres and tubes were held eligible as capital goods for the relevant period. Wire rope was allowed on the basis of Tribunal authority treating such items used in the factory as eligible. Jointing sheet and leak repair clamp were treated as eligible because they were used in the plant to prevent leakage. Pneumatic cylinders were denied credit because no declaration had been filed, and the relevant amended rule was applied to pending cases.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible on electrical items, tyres and tubes, wire rope, jointing sheet and leak repair clamp, but not admissible on pneumatic cylinders, partly in favour of the assessee and partly against the assessee.
Issue (iv): Whether credit could be taken on the original copy of invoice and on goods covered by the declaration requirement.
Analysis: Credit taken on the original invoice without informing the Revenue was held to be impermissible. The rule required the duplicate copy, and use of the original copy was allowed only on satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner when the duplicate was lost in transit. Since that procedure was not followed, denial was justified.
Conclusion: Credit on the original invoice was not admissible and the denial was upheld, against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed only to the extent of credit on iron and steel items, electrical items, tyres and tubes, wire rope, jointing sheet and leak repair clamp, and was rejected for welding electrodes, D.A. gas, calibration gas, boric acid, the original invoice claim and pneumatic cylinders.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit is available only for goods found to be used in or in relation to the manufacture or for eligible plant use under the applicable credit rules, while credit may be denied where the procedural conditions for taking credit, including invoice and declaration requirements, are not satisfied.