Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts were unexplained income liable to be added under section 68, or were duly explained as sale consideration, including on-money, received on sale of agricultural property.
Analysis: The assessee produced the agreement for sale, the purchaser's affidavit confirming payment of the higher consideration, and supporting bank material. The recorded sale deed showed a lower value, but the evidence on record supported the assessee's case that the amounts deposited in the banks represented the actual consideration received from the land transaction. The Assessing Officer did not bring any counter-evidence to show a different source of funds or to discredit the material produced by the assessee. In these circumstances, the explanation for the deposits was accepted as satisfactory.
Conclusion: The deposits were not treated as unexplained income, and the addition was deleted. The Revenue's appeal failed.