Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be closed after the cheque amount with interest had been deposited by the accused, even without the complainant's consent.
Analysis: The deposit of the entire cheque amount with interest in compliance with the Court's interim order satisfied the compensatory purpose of the proceeding. Relying on the principle recognised in Meters and Instruments, the Court held that the offence under Section 138 is primarily compensatory and that, once the complainant has been duly compensated, the Court may close the proceedings in exercise of its powers under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, even if the complainant does not consent. The Court further noticed that the matter was still at an early stage and no useful purpose would be served by keeping it pending.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the petitioner. The Court held that the proceedings could be closed notwithstanding the complainant's refusal, once the cheque amount with interest stood paid.
Final Conclusion: The revision was allowed and the matter was sent back for further decision in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court, after setting aside the order refusing permission to pay and close the matter.
Ratio Decidendi: In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, once the accused has paid the cheque amount with assessed interest and costs so that the complainant stands compensated, the Court may close the proceedings under Section 143 of that Act read with Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, even without the complainant's consent.