Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2021 (11) TMI 1057 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rejects settlement plans, orders creditors meeting. Hearing set for November 25. The Tribunal rejected the settlement plans due to a lack of consensus and trust deficit among allottees, directing the IRP/RP to convene a Committee of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rejects settlement plans, orders creditors meeting. Hearing set for November 25.

                          The Tribunal rejected the settlement plans due to a lack of consensus and trust deficit among allottees, directing the IRP/RP to convene a Committee of Creditors meeting within ten days to determine the next steps for completing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Debtor. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 25th November 2021, with parties instructed to submit their notes before the next hearing.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Admission of the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
                          2. Interim stay order restraining the Constitution of Committee of Creditors.
                          3. Filing and modification of the settlement plan by the Appellant.
                          4. Objections against the modification application and settlement plan.
                          5. Status report by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
                          6. Trust deficit among homebuyers and the feasibility of the settlement plan.
                          7. Directions for the continuation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Admission of the Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
                          The appeal was filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority passed on 22nd November 2019, admitting the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and appointing Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) Mr. Bhim Sain Goyal.

                          2. Interim Stay Order Restraining the Constitution of Committee of Creditors:
                          On 19th December 2019, the Appellate Tribunal passed an interim stay order restraining the Constitution of Committee of Creditors (CoC).

                          3. Filing and Modification of the Settlement Plan by the Appellant:
                          The Appellant filed IA No. 1115 of 2020 for modification of the order dated 26th February 2020. The Appellant claimed to have filed a settlement plan detailing the completion of the housing project and requested the modification of the order to allow the Appellant to work on the proposal. The Appellant argued that the settlement plan filed on 13th February 2020 covered all the allottees and that funds had been arranged to complete the project.

                          4. Objections Against the Modification Application and Settlement Plan:
                          Interveners and non-applicants filed objections against the modification application, arguing that the application was against the interest of home buyers/financial creditors and the purpose of the IBC. They contended that the settlement agreement proposed by the Appellant did not encompass all home buyers, leading to the Tribunal's order on 26th February 2020 to proceed with the CIRP.

                          5. Status Report by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):
                          The IRP submitted a status report on 26th March 2021, detailing the construction status, funds flow, concerns of homebuyers, and contractor’s concerns. The report indicated that the project was approximately 70% complete and highlighted the financial and logistical challenges in completing the project. The IRP also noted the lack of consensus among homebuyers and the concerns regarding the trustworthiness of the Appellant.

                          6. Trust Deficit Among Homebuyers and the Feasibility of the Settlement Plan:
                          The Tribunal observed a significant trust deficit among homebuyers regarding the Appellant's ability to complete the project. Some homebuyers supported the reverse CIRP, while others preferred the project to be completed through the CIRP process due to distrust in the Appellant. The Tribunal noted that the proposed reverse insolvency appeared to be a device for buying time, and there was no consensus among allottees for the settlement plan.

                          7. Directions for the Continuation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):
                          The Tribunal concluded that the settlement plan dated 13th February 2020 and the revised settlement plan dated 15th March 2021 deserved to be rejected due to the lack of consensus and trust deficit among the allottees. The Tribunal directed the IRP/RP to hold a meeting of the Committee of Creditors within ten days to decide the future course of action for the completion of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. The appeal was listed for hearing on 25th November 2021, with instructions for parties to file their notes of submission in both soft and hard copies before the next hearing date.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found