Expired minor penalty cannot by itself bar promotion; overall service record must be assessed before rejection.

Where the currency of a minor penalty has expired, suitability for promotion must be assessed on the overall service record and not rejected merely because the penalty once fell within the assessment period. The HC found no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's direction to reconsider the respondent's case for promotion to IAS, because the Tribunal had applied the relevant DoPT and UPSC guidelines and noted that the rejection was based only on the earlier presence of the penalty in the matrix, without evaluating the record after expiry of the penalty period. The writ challenge failed and the reconsideration direction remained in force.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal committed any jurisdictional error in directing reconsideration of the respondent's case for promotion to IAS after the expiry of the penalty period.

Analysis: The Tribunal had examined the effect of the minor penalty on future promotion consideration, compared the DoPT guidelines with the UPSC's internal guidelines, and found that the respondent's case had been rejected merely because the penalty had once fallen within the assessment matrix, without an assessment of the overall service record after the currency of the penalty had expired. The Court found no jurisdictional error in that reasoning and held that the Tribunal had considered the materials and the applicable guidelines in a proper manner.

Conclusion: The challenge to the Tribunal's order failed. The writ petition was not entertained and the direction to reconsider the respondent's case stood undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the currency of a minor penalty has expired, suitability for promotion must be assessed on the overall service record and not rejected solely because the penalty had once existed within the assessment period.

---