Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the revised cess notification should be disposed of by following the earlier common order and making the petitioner continue payment under protest pending the Supreme Court's decision.
Analysis: The petition concerned the same levy and the same statutory regime that was already under consideration in connected matters before the Supreme Court. The earlier Division Bench order had directed that cess be deposited under protest and that the consequences would depend on the final decision of the Supreme Court. In view of the binding force of the Supreme Court's eventual decision under Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the present petition was treated in the same manner and no independent final adjudication on the validity of the levy was undertaken.
Conclusion: The petitioner was directed to continue depositing the cess under protest and the matter was disposed of subject to the outcome of the pending Supreme Court proceedings.