Reinsurance premium of a non-resident was held outside India's tax net where Indian support functions did not create a permanent establishment.

Reinsurance premium earned by a non-resident German reinsurer from Indian insurers was treated as not taxable in India because the contracts were concluded outside India and the Indian subsidiary and liaison office performed only preparatory or auxiliary functions. The subsidiary's support activities, including data collection, verification, market intelligence, administration, representation and training, were expressly restricted from contract conclusion, negotiation, final documentation or underwriting recommendations, so they did not create a business connection or a fixed place PE. The liaison office was limited to communication functions and could not engage in trading or reinsurance activity. The Revenue also failed to show authority in the subsidiary to conclude contracts or solicit business, so no dependent agent PE existed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reinsurance premium earned by the non-resident assessee was taxable in India on account of business connection or the existence of a fixed place permanent establishment or dependent agent permanent establishment through its Indian subsidiary and liaison office.

Analysis: The assessee, a German tax resident engaged in global reinsurance, earned premium from Indian insurers under contracts concluded outside India. The Indian subsidiary rendered only support functions such as collecting and verifying data, entering information into pre-approved models, market intelligence, administrative assistance, representation, and training. The service arrangement expressly prohibited the subsidiary from concluding binding reinsurance contracts, negotiating on behalf of the assessee, preparing final treaty documents, passing unauthorized quotations or recommendations on underwriting matters. The liaison office was permitted only to act as a communication channel and was barred from any trading, commercial, industrial, insurance, reinsurance, cession, or retrocession activity. These activities were held to be preparatory or auxiliary in character and not enough to constitute a business connection or a permanent establishment. The place of business of the Indian subsidiary was not treated as the assessee's fixed place of business, and the Revenue failed to show any authority in the subsidiary to conclude contracts or solicit business on behalf of the assessee so as to establish a dependent agent permanent establishment.

Conclusion: The assessee did not have a business connection or a permanent establishment in India, and the reinsurance premium was not taxable in India on that basis.

---