TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reinsurance premium ceded to non-resident reinsurers was chargeable to tax in India so as to attract deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and consequent disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment of reinsurance premium to non-resident reinsurers was held to be not chargeable to tax in India. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the non-resident reinsurers had no business connection or permanent establishment in India, the reinsurance income did not accrue or arise in India, and the obligation under section 195 arises only when the sum paid is chargeable to tax in India. Since the payment was outside the tax net, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The disallowance of reinsurance premium under section 40(a)(i) was not justified and was deleted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
