Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the section 7 application was barred by limitation or saved by acknowledgment of liability under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. (ii) Whether the petition satisfied the requirements for admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Issue (i): Whether the section 7 application was barred by limitation or saved by acknowledgment of liability under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governs applications under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and limitation runs from the date when the right to apply accrues. On the facts, the date of default was treated as the starting point, but the record also contained several written offers for settlement and one OTS proposal made within the limitation period. Those letters constituted acknowledgment of the debt and liability within the meaning of section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, thereby extending the period of limitation.
Conclusion: The application was held to be within limitation and not barred by time.
Issue (ii): Whether the petition satisfied the requirements for admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The petition was found to be in proper form, supported by the loan documents, recall notice, CIBIL report and the written communication of the proposed interim resolution professional. The authority of the person initiating the proceedings on behalf of the financial creditor was also accepted. The existence of a financial debt and default was treated as established for admission purposes.
Conclusion: The petition was admitted and corporate insolvency resolution process was directed to commence.
Final Conclusion: The financial creditor succeeded in establishing a maintainable and timely section 7 application, resulting in commencement of insolvency proceedings and the consequential moratorium and interim resolution process directions.
Ratio Decidendi: For a section 7 insolvency application, limitation is governed by article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and a written acknowledgment of liability made within the limitation period extends time under section 18 of that Act.