Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation, or whether the corporate debtor's balance sheets and financial statements amounted to acknowledgment of liability so as to extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The sole defence was that the debt was time-barred. The financial creditor produced annual returns and balance sheets filed by the corporate debtor showing the debentures and the recalled secured loans as outstanding liabilities. The adjudicating authority treated these entries, made from year to year, as clear acknowledgments of liability. It also noted that the corporate debtor had been referred to BIFR and that the period during which proceedings were barred by the sick company regime stood excluded while computing limitation. Reliance was placed on the settled position that entries in balance sheets and financial statements can constitute acknowledgment within the meaning of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Conclusion: The application was held to be within limitation and was admitted; the plea of time-bar failed.