Pandemic protections and auction relief for seized vehicles extended subject to fresh notice and legal compliance

The Court continued its COVID-19 related protective regime in light of the ongoing pandemic and the continuing difficulty of accessing courts and complying with time-bound directions, extending those protections up to 25 November 2020 with stated modifications. It also relaxed the earlier embargo on auction of seized vehicles, accepting that hypothecated assets were deteriorating in value, but required a fresh pre-sale notice to the loanees before auction could proceed. The order therefore preserved temporary pandemic safeguards while allowing limited enforcement action for seized vehicles, subject to prior notice and compliance with law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the existing COVID-19 related protections granted by the Court should be further extended in view of the prevailing pandemic situation; (ii) Whether the restriction on auction of seized vehicles should be relaxed to permit auction on issuance of fresh pre-sale notice to the loanees.

Issue (i): Whether the existing COVID-19 related protections granted by the Court should be further extended in view of the prevailing pandemic situation.

Analysis: The order records that the earlier protective directions were repeatedly extended from time to time because access to courts and compliance with time-bound directions continued to be affected by the pandemic. The Court treated the situation as warranting continuation of the temporary protective regime, while preserving earlier directions that operated until further orders and allowing parties to seek appropriate relief in case of undue hardship.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 related protections were extended up to 25 November 2020, with the stated modifications.

Issue (ii): Whether the restriction on auction of seized vehicles should be relaxed to permit auction on issuance of fresh pre-sale notice to the loanees.

Analysis: The intervenors sought permission to proceed with auction of vehicles seized before lockdown, contending that the assets were hypothecated, were deteriorating in value, and would not benefit either side if kept unused. The Court accepted the request to the limited extent of modifying the earlier auction restriction, but required a fresh pre-sale notice to be issued to the loanees before proceeding under law.

Conclusion: The earlier restriction was relaxed to enable auction of the seized vehicles after fresh pre-sale notice and in accordance with law.

Final Conclusion: The petition resulted in continuation of the pandemic-related protective orders, while permitting limited relaxation of the auction embargo for seized vehicles subject to fresh notice and legal compliance.

---