High Court Grants Temporary Bail with Conditions Emphasizing Expedited Decision-Making

The High Court modified the trial court's decision to grant permanent bail based on incomplete medical examination, granting temporary bail for two months to the respondent. The conditions include surrendering the passport, reporting to the Enforcement Directorate fortnightly, and allowing the respondent to apply for bail on merits before the Special Court. The High Court emphasized the need for expeditious decision-making.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legitimacy of granting bail on medical grounds.
2. Compliance with procedural requirements for medical examination.
3. Adequacy of medical treatment provided to the accused.
4. Appropriateness of the trial court's decision to grant permanent bail.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Legitimacy of Granting Bail on Medical Grounds:
The application by the Directorate of Enforcement challenges the order dated April 3, 2021, by the Special Judge under the PMLA Act, which granted bail to the respondent on medical grounds. The applicant contends that the Special Judge should not have granted bail based on the respondent's health condition, as the application was primarily on merits with some averments regarding health.

2. Compliance with Procedural Requirements for Medical Examination:
The procedural history shows multiple adjournments for filing responses and obtaining medical reports. The trial court issued several directions to the Jail Superintendent to submit the latest medical report, which was delayed, leading to a show-cause notice. The trial court, on March 30, 2021, issued a show-cause notice to the jail superintendent for non-compliance with court orders.

3. Adequacy of Medical Treatment Provided to the Accused:
The respondent's counsel argued that the respondent's medical condition warranted bail due to inadequate treatment in jail. The court called for a medical report from J.J. Hospital, which indicated that the respondent needed specialized treatment not available in the jail. The respondent was later diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to St. George’s Hospital, further complicating his medical condition and treatment needs.

4. Appropriateness of the Trial Court's Decision to Grant Permanent Bail:
The trial court's decision to grant permanent bail was contested as being based on an incomplete medical examination. The High Court noted that while the trial court had the authority to grant bail under Section 45 on medical grounds, the conditions and ongoing treatment required a more temporary solution. The High Court modified the order to grant temporary bail for two months, allowing the respondent to receive necessary medical treatment.

Separate Judgments:
The judgment does not indicate separate judgments by different judges; hence, it is treated as a single comprehensive judgment.

Conclusion:
The High Court modified the trial court's order, granting temporary bail for two months, subject to several conditions, including surrendering the passport and reporting to the Enforcement Directorate fortnightly. The respondent is allowed to apply for bail on merits before the Special Court, which should decide expeditiously. The bail application is disposed of accordingly.

---