Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to permanent bail on medical grounds under the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and whether the High Court erred in interfering with the Sessions Court's bail order.
Analysis: The petitioner sought release under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, relying on medical records and the first proviso to Section 45(1). The High Court had examined the medical board report and concluded that permanent bail was not warranted, while granting temporary bail for treatment. The material before the Court did not show any error in the High Court's interference with the Sessions Court's order. At the same time, the medical condition of the petitioner justified limited temporary relief.
Conclusion: The challenge to the High Court's order failed, and permanent bail was declined, but temporary bail for four months was granted on the conditions imposed by the High Court.