Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payments received from licensing of manufacturing and distribution rights were taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-US tax treaty, or whether the matter should be set aside for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The dispute was confined to the characterisation of the receipts from licensing of software-related rights. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue in the assessee's own earlier years had already been decided by following the jurisdictional High Court decision in Infrasoft, and that the coordinate bench had restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with that decision. Following the same course, the Tribunal again set aside the issue to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication in accordance with law and the earlier order.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision, and the assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an identical royalty characterization issue has already been remanded in the assessee's own case, the same course may be followed and the matter sent back for fresh adjudication in line with the binding jurisdictional precedent.