Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 was liable to be condoned and the application for revocation could be considered subject to payment of tax, interest, penalty and late fee.
Analysis: The opposite parties stated that if the delay in filing the revocation application was condoned and the petitioner complied with the requirement of paying the taxes, interest, penalty and late fee due, the return filed by the petitioner would be accepted. In view of that stand, the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 was condoned and the petitioner was directed to deposit the dues and complete the formalities. The application for revocation was required to be considered in accordance with law, and the proper officer was directed to open the portal to enable filing of the return after compliance.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned and the petitioner obtained relief to the extent of consideration of the revocation application and reopening of the portal, subject to compliance with the specified conditions.