Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the relinquishment of rights in immovable property without consideration was a gift falling within section 47(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and, if so, whether section 50C could be invoked to compute short-term capital gain.
Analysis: The assessee and other co-owners relinquished their rights in the property without receiving any consideration. The transaction was therefore treated as being in the nature of a gift. The definition of transfer in section 2(47)(i) was noted, but for capital gains computation the transaction must first fall within section 45. Section 47(iii) excludes transfers by way of gift from the ambit of section 45. Since no consideration was received, the statutory condition for applying section 50C, which operates only in the capital gains framework, was not satisfied. The relinquishment deed was genuine and the transfer was without consideration.
Conclusion: The addition towards short-term capital gain was not sustainable. The relinquishment was held to be a gift covered by section 47(iii), and section 50C was held inapplicable. Relief was granted to the assessee on this issue.