Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the landlord's non-disclosure of accommodation at Subzi Mandi was fatal to an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e), and whether the High Court could interfere in revision under the proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Analysis: The requirement under Section 14(1)(e) is not confined to a bare plea of bona fide need; it also includes the question whether the landlord has any other reasonably suitable residential accommodation. These matters are interconnected, and the Court may examine the surrounding facts to determine whether the claim is genuine. The High Court was justified in reappraising the record because the Rent Controller treated the alleged non-disclosure as fatal on a wrong legal premise. The revisional power, though limited, extends to correcting errors of law and to examining whether the finding rests on a proper legal basis. The absence of perfect pleadings was not decisive where both sides had understood the real controversy and placed the relevant material before the Court.
Conclusion: The eviction order was upheld, the appeal was dismissed, and the landlord's non-disclosure was held not to be fatal in the facts of the case.