Appeal allowed against penalty under Income Tax Act. No satisfaction recorded for penalty initiation.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that since no satisfaction was recorded for initiating the penalty under section 271D, following legal precedents, the penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 was quashed. The order was pronounced on 13-12-2019.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals) confirming penalty under section 271D of the Act.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals) confirming the penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessee had accepted deposits exceeding a certain amount in contravention of section 269SS of the Act, leading to the imposition of a penalty after issuing a show cause notice. The Assessee contended that no satisfaction was recorded by the Assessing Officer before levying the penalty under section 271D of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal referred to relevant judgments, including the case of ITO Vs. Jay Laxmi Rice Mills, where it was held that if no satisfaction was recorded in the assessment order regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings, then no penalty could be levied. The Tribunal also cited the case of Vave Infotainment Network Ltd., Vs. Addl.CIT, wherein it was similarly held that no satisfaction was recorded for initiating penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Act. Based on these precedents, the Tribunal concluded that since no satisfaction was recorded for initiating the penalty under section 271D of the Act in the present case, the penalty could not be levied.

The Tribunal found that the facts of the present case were identical to the cases referenced in the judgments, where no satisfaction was recorded before initiating penalty proceedings. Therefore, relying on the legal precedents, the Tribunal held that in the absence of recorded satisfaction, the penalty under section 271D of the Act could not be imposed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 levied under section 271D of the Act, allowing the appeal filed by the Assessee. The Tribunal pronounced the order in open court on 13-12-2019, allowing the appeal of the Assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Act for the assessment year 2010-11.

---