Tribunal Appoints New Resolution Professional for Corporate Debtor The Tribunal allowed the application for appointing a new Resolution Professional (RP), Mr. Sandeep Mahajan, in place of the existing RP, Mr. Mohan Lal ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Appoints New Resolution Professional for Corporate Debtor
The Tribunal allowed the application for appointing a new Resolution Professional (RP), Mr. Sandeep Mahajan, in place of the existing RP, Mr. Mohan Lal Jain, for a Corporate Debtor. Despite subsequent modifications in the resolution, the Tribunal proceeded with the application based on the original resolution passed by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 05.09.2018. Emphasizing the need for expeditious decision-making in Corporate Insolvency Resolution processes, the Tribunal appointed Mr. Sandeep Mahajan as the new RP, highlighting compliance with the requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Issues: 1. Application for appointing a new Resolution Professional (RP) in place of the existing RP. 2. Validity of the resolution passed by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) for the replacement of RP. 3. Opposition to the application based on subsequent developments and modifications in the resolution. 4. Consideration of the necessity to wait for CoC's ratification for filing the application. 5. Compliance with the requirements of Section 27 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: 1. The Tribunal considered an application seeking the appointment of a new RP, Mr. Sandeep Mahajan, in place of the current RP, Mr. Mohan Lal Jain, for a Corporate Debtor. The application was supported by a resolution passed by 98.74% voting share of the CoC on 05.09.2018, in accordance with Section 27 of the IBC, 2016. The resolution aimed to replace the existing RP with Mr. Sandeep Mahajan, and the CoC's consent was obtained for this change.
2. The Respondent's counsel opposed the application, citing subsequent developments where the resolution dated 05.09.2018 was modified on 10.09.2018. The modification involved Canara Bank filing the application instead of the RP for the change of RP. Additionally, it was mentioned that the resolution dated 10.09.2018 was subject to ratification by the CoC in a subsequent meeting. Despite these developments, the Tribunal proceeded with the consideration of the application based on the original resolution passed on 05.09.2018.
3. The Tribunal emphasized the need for expeditious decision-making in Corporate Insolvency Resolution (CIR) processes, stating that speed is essential. Therefore, the Tribunal decided not to wait for CoC's ratification for filing the application and entertained the application filed by the RP. The Tribunal found that the requirement of Section 27 was satisfied, leading to the allowance of the application and the appointment of Mr. Sandeep Mahajan as the new RP, replacing Mr. Mohan Lal Jain.
4. The Tribunal disposed of the case, CA-869(PB)/2018, after appointing Mr. Sandeep Mahajan as the RP based on the resolution passed by the CoC on 05.09.2018. The judgment highlighted the importance of timely decision-making in insolvency matters and the significance of complying with the statutory provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.