Tribunal dismisses appeal over disallowance under Income Tax Act; Rule 8D not applicable pre-2008.

The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order adding Rs. 23,75,000/- u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D for Assessment Year 2006-07. The Bombay High Court held Rule 8D applicable only from Assessment Year 2008-09, rejecting the Special Bench of ITAT's decision. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the disallowance, citing the appellant's sufficient funds for investments and lack of interest expenses on the amount. The revenue's dissatisfaction with the assessee's disallowance working was not proven, leading to the Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues involved: Appeal against order of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) u/s 14A of I.T. Act read with rule 8D of Income Tax rules for Assessment Year 2006-07.

Summary:
The revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the addition of Rs. 23,75,000/- u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D. The Assessing Officer disallowed the sum of Rs. 23,75,007/- as expenses after applying Rule 8D. However, the CIT(A) deleted the disallowance stating that the appellant had sufficient funds for investments and no interest expenses were incurred on the amount in question. The AO's dissatisfaction with the working of disallowance given by the assessee was not demonstrated. The Bombay High Court held that Rule 8D is applicable only from Assessment Year 2008-09, overruling the decision of the Special Bench of ITAT in a previous case. The Tribunal rejected the revenue's ground, stating it had no merit based on the current legal position.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, emphasizing the inapplicability of Rule 8D for the relevant assessment year and the lack of demonstrated dissatisfaction by the Assessing Officer with the assessee's working of disallowance u/s 14A.

---