Tribunal admits application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, declares moratorium, appoints Resolution Professional The Tribunal admitted the Operational Creditor's application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the Corporate Debtor for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal admits application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, declares moratorium, appoints Resolution Professional
The Tribunal admitted the Operational Creditor's application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the Corporate Debtor for non-payment, declaring a moratorium and initiating the Corporate Resolution Process. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed to manage the process, with directions to conduct the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process within the prescribed timeline, convene a meeting of creditors, and identify a resolution applicant. The moratorium prohibited suits against the Corporate Debtor, asset transfer, and enforced the supply of essential goods/services.
Issues: Application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for non-payment by the Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor.
Detailed Analysis: 1. The Operational Creditor (OC) filed an application against the Corporate Debtor (CD) for non-payment, seeking an order of injunction to prevent asset transfer by the CD. 2. Due to disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing was conducted via video conference. The CD argued against granting an injunction, claiming the OC was using coercive tactics for recovery. 3. The OC provided evidence of supplying marble slabs to the CD for a hotel project, with payments remaining due. The CD acknowledged the debt but cited financial constraints for non-payment. 4. Despite multiple requests, the CD failed to pay the outstanding amount, acknowledging the debt in correspondence. The OC issued a demand notice under the IBC, which was replied to by the CD seeking more time for payment. 5. The CD's attempts to arrange funds were unsuccessful, leading to non-payment. The CD denied asset transfer and argued against the application as a recovery proceeding. 6. The Tribunal found the OC had met all requirements under section 9(3) of the Code, with no merit in the CD's argument against the application. 7. The correspondence between the OC and CD, along with supporting documents, proved the debt was due and not barred by limitation. 8. The Tribunal admitted the application under section 9 of the Code, declaring a moratorium and initiating the Corporate Resolution Process against the CD. 9. The moratorium prohibited suits against the CD, asset transfer, and enforced the supply of essential goods/services. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed to manage the process. 10. The Tribunal directed the IRP to conduct the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process within the prescribed timeline, convene a meeting of creditors, and identify a resolution applicant. 11. The Registry was instructed to communicate the order to all parties, with subsequent progress reports required. Certified copies of the order were to be issued upon formalities' compliance.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.