Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable on account of low tax effect under the CBDT circulars, and whether any exception to the monetary limit applied.
Analysis: The tax effect in dispute was found to be below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs under Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, which enhanced the limits fixed by Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 and applied to pending appeals as well. The Tribunal held that the case did not fall within the exceptions in paragraph 10 of Circular No. 3 of 2018, and that the later Circular No. 23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019, read with the office memorandum dated 16.09.2019, applied only to bogus LTCG/STCL penny stock and not to accommodation share application money cases.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was not maintainable because of the low tax effect and was dismissed.