Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a second motion petition for approval of a scheme of arrangement by amalgamation, the Tribunal should fix the petition for hearing and issue directions for publication and service of notices to the prescribed authorities and objectors.
Analysis: The petition was filed under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 15(1) of the Companies (Compromise, Arrangements, Amalgamation) Rules, 2016. The record showed that the first motion had already resulted in dispensation of meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors of the transferor company, and the equity shareholders of the transferee company. In the second motion, the Tribunal proceeded to regulate the approval process by fixing the date of hearing and directing publication in specified newspapers, service of notices on the prescribed statutory authorities, service on objectors, filing of affidavit of service, and invitation of objections within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the scheme petition to be listed for hearing and issued the consequential notices, publication, and service directions required for consideration of approval of the scheme.