Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was liable to be admitted for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Analysis: The appellate tribunal had already set aside the earlier dismissal, held that the debt was payable and default had occurred, and remitted the matter for admission after notice. In the remanded proceedings, notice was served on the corporate debtor, which remained absent and was proceeded ex parte. The application was found to satisfy the requirements of Section 7, including the proposal of an insolvency resolution professional and the absence of any pending disciplinary proceeding against him.
Conclusion: The application was admitted and the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was directed to commence against the corporate debtor.
Ratio Decidendi: Where debt and default stand established and the statutory requirements for a Section 7 application are met, the application is to be admitted and CIRP is to be initiated.