TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court quashes order, orders re-hearing. Petitioner granted opportunity to present case.</h1> <h3>Bhagavan Textiles (Defunct) Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi, The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Gandhipuram Circle, Coimbatore.</h3> The High Court of Madras quashed an impugned order of attachment in a writ petition due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to present their case. ... Validity of attachment order - order of attachment passed without passing assessment order - opportunity to put forth the case also not provided - HELD THAT:- Indisputably the petitioner was not given an opportunity before passing the impugned order of attachment. In such view of the matter, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the same is set aside. The second respondent shall pass order afresh, after giving opportunity to the petitioner and in accordance with law and the petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent, within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, failing which, the impugned order will hold good. The petition is disposed off. The High Court of Madras quashed an impugned order of attachment in a writ petition due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to present their case. The court directed the second respondent to pass a new order after giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The petitioner must appear before the second respondent within two weeks from receiving the order.
TaxTMI 
