Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the consideration received under the Master Service Agreement was taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services, or whether it constituted business profits not chargeable to tax in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions in the assessee's own case for prior assessment years, where identical receipts from the same counterparty had been held to be neither royalty nor fees for technical services. It was accepted that the services were in the nature of advisory and consulting services, and that nothing was made available to the recipient so as to bring the receipts within fees for technical services. The Tribunal also reiterated that the receipts were business profits and, since the assessee had no permanent establishment in India, the income could not be brought to tax in India.
Conclusion: The receipt under the Master Service Agreement was not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services and, being business profits in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, was not chargeable to tax in India; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Advisory or consulting receipts are not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services unless the statutory treaty requirements are met, and in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, such business profits are not taxable in India.