Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the consulting fees received by the assessee from Indian entities were taxable as royalty or fees for included services, or were not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the identical issue had already been decided in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years. Those decisions had held that the consideration was paid for advising, recommending, assisting, conducting training programmes and reviewing healthcare projects, and that such receipts did not amount to royalty because they were not consideration for the use of any copyright, trademark or industrial, commercial or scientific experience. The receipts also did not constitute fees for included services because no technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or process was made available. The Tribunal further noted that the assessee had no permanent establishment in India and that the earlier orders, though carried in appeal by the Revenue, had not been reversed.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty or fees for included services in India, and the appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed.