TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the accused's act fell within Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 so as to reduce the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; (ii) Whether non-compliance with Section 207-A(4) and Section 207-A(9) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 vitiated the committal proceedings and the trial, or whether the irregularity was cured by Section 537 of that Code.
Issue (i): Whether the accused's act fell within Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 so as to reduce the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Analysis: The evidence established that the deceased was strangled and that the accused alone was responsible for the death. The Court accepted the letter found on the body and the surrounding circumstances as showing that the accused acted after the deceased confessed to illicit intimacy and pregnancy by another man. On those facts, the Court held that the accused acted under grave and sudden provocation, losing self-control at the moment of confession. The case was not brought within the proviso to Exception 1, because the provocation was not sought or voluntarily provoked as a pretext for killing.
Conclusion: The offence was held to be culpable homicide not amounting to murder, not murder.
Issue (ii): Whether non-compliance with Section 207-A(4) and Section 207-A(9) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 vitiated the committal proceedings and the trial, or whether the irregularity was cured by Section 537 of that Code.
Analysis: The Court construed Section 207-A(4) as empowering the Magistrate to examine witnesses to the actual commission of the offence where available, and also, if necessary, other witnesses. It held that the provision did not prevent committal on circumstantial evidence where no eyewitnesses were produced. As to Section 207-A(9), the Court held that failure to require the accused to furnish a list of defence witnesses was a breach of procedure, but not one that automatically invalidated the trial. Since no failure of justice was shown, the irregularity was treated as curable under Section 537.
Conclusion: The committal and trial were not vitiated, and the defect stood cured.
Final Conclusion: The conviction for murder and the sentence of death were set aside, and the accused was convicted only for culpable homicide not amounting to murder with a term of rigorous imprisonment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a killing is committed under grave and sudden provocation arising from an immediate confession of adultery and pregnancy, the offence may fall within Exception 1 to Section 300; and procedural irregularities in committal proceedings do not invalidate the trial unless they occasion a failure of justice.
TaxTMI 
