Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a deemed university engaged in imparting higher education performs a public function and is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The governing test is not confined to the formal source of the body's power but extends to the nature of the function discharged. A body performing public duties or public law functions may be subjected to writ jurisdiction even if it is not a statutory authority in the narrow sense. Education imparted to students at large is a public function, and a deemed university, whose activities are regulated under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, discharges functions that have a clear public element. Such a body falls within the broad reach of Article 226 and, as a consequence, is amenable to judicial review by writ.
Conclusion: The writ petition was maintainable against the deemed university, and the contrary view of the Division Bench was incorrect.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the finding of non-maintainability was reversed, and the matter was sent back for decision on merits by the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi: A body that performs public functions or public duties, including a deemed university engaged in imparting education, is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.