Tribunal overturns interest disallowance for capital work in progress, cites own funds cover.

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital work in progress and on working capital advance and other expenses for different assessment years. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing officer for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in 'CIT (LTU) Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.' The disallowances were found unjustified as the assessee had sufficient own funds to cover the investments and capital advances, leading to the deletion of disallowances made by lower authorities for various expenses.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital work in progress.
2. Disallowance of interest on working capital advance and other expenses.

Issue 1: Disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital work in progress:
- The assessee appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 29,10,663 out of the interest account under section 36(1)(iii) for assessment year 2013-14.
- The Assessing officer found that the assessee had shown capital work in progress amounting to Rs. 31,50,70,871 and made payments using borrowed funds.
- The Assessing officer calculated notional interest expenditure to be capitalized under section 36(1)(iii) due to lack of specific details provided by the assessee.
- The assessee argued that funds for building were from interest-free funds and own funds, and interest on term loans for machinery was duly capitalized.
- The Tribunal set aside lower authorities' orders and remanded the matter to the Assessing officer to consider the assessee's contentions and decide afresh in light of the Supreme Court's decision in 'CIT (LTU) Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.'

Issue 2: Disallowance of interest on working capital advance and other expenses:
- The assessee appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 4,86,491 out of the interest account and Rs. 3,39,385 out of various expenses for a different assessment year.
- The Assessing officer disallowed interest on working capital advance and other expenses under section 36(1)(iii) and section 36(i)(ii) respectively.
- The assessee contended that it had sufficient own funds to meet the investments and capital advances.
- The Tribunal found that the assessee had own sufficient/interest-free funds to cover the capital advances, and the disallowances were unjustified based on the Supreme Court's decision in 'CIT (LTU) Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.'
- Disallowances made by lower authorities in respect of various expenses were ordered to be deleted due to proper documentation and nature of expenditures.
- The appeal was allowed for both assessment years, and the orders were pronounced in open court on 22.04.2019.

This detailed analysis covers the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital work in progress and the disallowance of interest on working capital advance and other expenses, providing a comprehensive understanding of the judgment.

---