Protection from coercive action was regulated by directions to cooperate, complete adjudication, and follow compliance timelines.

Petitioners sought protection against coercive action while adjudicatory proceedings under excise, service tax and GST laws were pending, and undertook to cooperate with the authority and produce all relevant material. The Court regulated the process by directing them to present their case before the concerned authority, which was instructed to complete the adjudication within eight weeks. If further steps were required after adjudication, two additional weeks were to be allowed for compliance. The petitioners were also directed to appear before the concerned police station by the specified date. Limited protection was thus granted through procedural directions and timelines, and the petition was disposed of.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to protection against coercive action pending completion of the adjudicatory process and permission to appear before the concerned authority.

Analysis: The petitioners expressed willingness to cooperate with the authority and to place all relevant material before it, while apprehending coercive action on the basis of summons issued under the relevant excise, service tax and GST provisions. The Court took note of this voluntary stance and directed the petitioners to represent their case before the concerned authority. The authority was directed to complete the process within eight weeks and, if further steps were required after completion of adjudication, to grant two additional weeks for necessary compliance. The petitioners were also directed to appear before the concerned police station by the specified date.

Conclusion: Limited protection was granted by regulating the process and timelines, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.

---