Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in a GST evasion case.
Analysis: The applicant was implicated in allegations of fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit through invoices without actual supply of goods. The Court noted that, as far as the applicant was concerned, the allegation relatable to M/s Martiz Cera was limited to about Rs. 32 lakhs, while the applicant expressed readiness to deposit that amount and to cooperate with the investigation. The Court also took into account the comparable relief granted in similar matters and the applicant's undertaking to assist the investigating agency.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted in favour of the applicant, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and deposit of Rs. 32 lakhs.