Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an individual partner can be made liable for the tax liability of a firm; (ii) whether recovery can be enforced against an individual partner on the strength of a tax recovery certificate issued only in the name of the firm.
Issue (i): Whether an individual partner can be made liable for the tax liability of a firm.
Analysis: Section 189(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 makes a partner liable to meet the tax liability of the firm. The statutory liability of the firm is thus not confined to the firm alone and extends to the partners.
Conclusion: Decided against the petitioner.
Issue (ii): Whether recovery can be enforced against an individual partner on the strength of a tax recovery certificate issued only in the name of the firm.
Analysis: A recovery certificate had been issued only against the firm, and not against the individual partner or partners. The certificate did not name the petitioner, yet the contemplated recovery would expose him to coercive process including civil prison. Such coercive recovery cannot be sustained against a person not named in the certificate.
Conclusion: Decided in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The partner's substantive liability for the firm's tax dues was upheld, but recovery against the petitioner on the basis of a certificate issued only in the firm's name was disallowed, leaving the department free to proceed by issuing a proper certificate against the petitioner or the partners.
Ratio Decidendi: Although a partner may be liable for the tax dues of the firm, coercive recovery cannot be taken against an individual partner unless the recovery certificate specifically authorises proceedings against that person.