Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 45B of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, which permits recovery of contributions as arrears of land revenue, could be applied to contributions that had become payable before the section came into force but remained unpaid thereafter.
Analysis: Section 45B was held to be a procedural provision concerned only with the mode of recovery. A procedural enactment may operate retrospectively unless such construction is textually inadmissible. The material point was that the contributions continued to remain unpaid when recovery was initiated after the provision had already come into force. Since the section did not create or extinguish the liability but only provided an enforceable mode for recovering an existing unpaid liability, it could be invoked for earlier unpaid contributions.
Conclusion: Section 45B could be pressed into service for recovering unpaid contributions that had fallen due before its insertion, and the recovery notices were valid.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the recovery mechanism under Section 45B was held applicable to the unpaid contributions in question.
Ratio Decidendi: A procedural provision governing the mode of recovery may apply to antecedent liabilities that remain unpaid when the provision comes into force, unless retrospective application is textually barred.