Himachal High Court Suspends Sentence, Requires Deposit & Bond The Himachal Pradesh High Court, under the judgment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, suspended the petitioner's sentence pending a revision ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Himachal High Court Suspends Sentence, Requires Deposit & Bond
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, under the judgment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, suspended the petitioner's sentence pending a revision petition, subject to a deposit of Rs. 3,50,000 in the Court's registry within eight weeks. Additionally, the petitioner was required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of the same amount. The judgment also mandated the transmission of bail bonds to the Court for record-keeping purposes. Any prior deposits in the trial court were to be taken into account, and provisions were made for potential alterations or modifications as necessary. The application was disposed of, with copies to be provided to relevant parties.
Issues Involved: Suspension of sentence pending revision petition, deposit amount required for suspension of sentence, furnishing of personal bond, transmission of bail bonds to the Court.
Analysis: The judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma of the Himachal Pradesh High Court pertains to a criminal matter. The court, after hearing the case, ordered that the sentence imposed on the petitioner in a previous judgment by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge would be suspended during the pendency of the main revision petition. However, this suspension was subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs. 3,50,000 in the Court's registry within eight weeks. The petitioner was also required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety of the same amount to ensure their presence in court as directed and to surrender in case the revision petition was dismissed.
Moreover, the judgment specified that any other amount previously deposited in the trial court should also be considered. The bail bonds provided by the petitioner were to be sent to the Court's registry for record-keeping. The judgment concluded by stating that any alterations, vacation, or modifications could be requested as needed. The application was disposed of, and a copy was to be provided to the concerned parties as per usual terms. This comprehensive analysis highlights the key aspects of the judgment, including the conditions for suspending the sentence, the deposit amount, the requirement of a personal bond, and the procedural aspects related to the bail bonds.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.