Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Money Laundering

        2018 (12) TMI 1879 - HC - Money Laundering

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court denies bail citing money laundering involvement, serious economic impact. Preliminary findings won't affect trial. The court rejected the bail application, citing sufficient evidence of the applicant's involvement in money laundering and serious impact on the economy. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Court denies bail citing money laundering involvement, serious economic impact. Preliminary findings won't affect trial.

                            The court rejected the bail application, citing sufficient evidence of the applicant's involvement in money laundering and serious impact on the economy. The applicant's role in the crime, involving significant amounts of money and international ramifications, led to the denial of bail. The court clarified that its findings were preliminary and would not affect the trial court's decision during the trial.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
                            2. Allegations of money laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
                            3. Connection between the present case and the predicate offence investigated by the Economic Offence Wing (EOW).
                            4. Evidence of the applicant's involvement in the alleged crime.
                            5. Seriousness of the offence and its impact on the economy.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Application for Bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure:
                            The applicant sought bail under Section 439 in connection with ECIR No.2 of 2016. The applicant was previously granted bail in a related case investigated by the EOW but was subsequently arrested in the current case on 18th June 2018. The Special Court had earlier rejected the applicant’s bail plea.

                            2. Allegations of Money Laundering under PMLA:
                            The prosecution alleged that the applicant was involved in money laundering activities as per the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of the IPC fall under scheduled offences covered in Part-A of paragraph (1) of the Schedule to the PMLA Act, 2002. The investigation revealed that funds raised through Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCB) were misappropriated and not used for their intended purpose.

                            3. Connection Between the Present Case and Predicate Offence Investigated by EOW:
                            The case initially registered by MIDC Police Station was later taken over by EOW, and the applicant was granted bail in that case. However, the present case, which is connected to the predicate offence, was assigned to the PMLA Court. The applicant was arrested after 25 months from his release on bail in the predicate offence.

                            4. Evidence of the Applicant's Involvement in the Alleged Crime:
                            The prosecution presented substantial evidence indicating the applicant’s involvement in the crime. The applicant, as the managing director of M/s.GL and in charge of certain products, was alleged to have projected the receipt of USD 31.79 million into the account of M/s.GTSL from M/s.YIL as untainted. The investigation revealed that the funds were not utilized for the intended purpose and were instead invested in shell companies and other entities. The applicant was also implicated in bogus purchases of software amounting to Rs. 608.64 crores, with Rs. 5.29 crores projected as untainted.

                            5. Seriousness of the Offence and Its Impact on the Economy:
                            The prosecution and the intervener emphasized the seriousness of the offence, highlighting its impact on the economy and foreign investors. The offence involved a significant amount of money and had international ramifications. The prosecution argued that the applicant played a vital role in laundering money, which affected public money and the economy.

                            Judgment:
                            The court rejected the bail application, noting that there was sufficient evidence showing the applicant's involvement in the crime. The court observed that the offence was serious, involving public money and having international ramifications. The applicant's role in laundering money was considered significant, and thus, bail was denied. The court clarified that its observations were prima facie for considering the bail and would not influence the trial court during the trial.

                            Order:
                            1. Bail Application No.2267 of 2018 was rejected.
                            2. Criminal Application No.1338 of 2018 was disposed of.
                            3. The observations made were prima facie for considering the bail and would not influence the trial court at the time of trial.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found