Assessee's Appeals Dismissed for Non-Representation: Lack of Seriousness in Pursuing Appeal

The appeals for A.Y. 2008-09 & 2011-12 were dismissed by the ITAT Ahmedabad due to the non-representation of the assessee during the hearing. Despite multiple notices and opportunities provided, the appellant failed to appear or seek an adjournment, displaying a lack of seriousness in pursuing the appeal. Citing relevant precedents, the Tribunal decided to dismiss the appeals in limine. The assessee was informed of the option to demonstrate a reasonable cause for non-representation for a potential recall of the order. However, in the absence of a valid cause, both appeals were ultimately dismissed on 13-11-2017.

---

---

Issues:
Appeals for A.Y. 2008-09 & 2011-12 dismissed for non-representation of the assessee.

Analysis:
The appeals in question, pertaining to Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2011-12, were brought before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad following the order of the CIT(A)-7, Ahmedabad dated 13-03-2015, under sections 143(3), 144, and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant-assessee during the hearing led the Tribunal to consider the matter. Despite sending a notice of hearing to the assessee on 11/10/2017 for the hearing scheduled on 13/11/2017, no representation was made by the assessee. The Tribunal noted the lack of seriousness on the part of the assessee in pursuing the appeal, given the failure to appear or seek an adjournment. Citing precedents, including Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd. and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holka vs. CWT, the Tribunal decided to dismiss the appeals in limine due to non-representation.

Furthermore, the Tribunal highlighted the option available to the assessee to demonstrate a reasonable cause for non-representation, allowing for a potential recall of the order if such a cause is established. This provision indicates a procedural opportunity for the assessee to address the dismissal of the appeals based on non-representation. Ultimately, in view of the circumstances and the lack of representation by the assessee, the Tribunal proceeded to dismiss both appeals of the Assessee. The order to dismiss the appeals was pronounced in open court on 13-11-2017, emphasizing the finality of the decision in the absence of representation and a valid cause for non-appearance.

---