Court orders early disposal of writ petition, parties directed to complete pleadings by set date

The Court granted the application for de-tagging of writ petition 5283 of 2011, emphasizing the need for early disposal for the interest of justice. An agreement was made to place the writ petition and Misc. Bench for final disposal on a specified date. Parties were directed to complete pleadings by the set date, and the hearing was peremptorily fixed. The focus was on expeditiously moving towards final disposal, showing the Court's dedication to ensuring timely resolution through coordinated efforts between parties and the Court.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application for de-tagging of writ petition 5283 of 2011
2. Early disposal of the petition for the interest of justice
3. Agreement on placing the writ petition and Misc. Bench for final disposal
4. Completion of pleadings by parties by a specified date
5. Peremptory fixing of the hearing date

Analysis:
1. The judgment pertains to an application for de-tagging of writ petition 5283 of 2011. The Court was informed that the application for de-tagging had been filed in pursuance of the liberty granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The learned counsel representing the petitioner in the writ petition expressed the intention to ensure the petition's early hearing and final disposal. It was emphasized that an early date for hearing both petitions would serve the interest of justice.

2. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's counsel's endeavor for an early hearing and final disposal of the petition. Consequently, an agreement was reached to place the writ petition No. 5283 of 2011 and Misc. Bench No. 9613 of 2014 for final disposal before the Bench assigned for hearing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) cases on a specified date, i.e., 12.01.2015. This decision aimed to expedite the process and serve the interest of justice by ensuring timely resolution of the matter.

3. In furtherance of the agreement reached, the parties were directed to complete their pleadings by the specified date to facilitate the hearing before the assigned Bench on 12.01.2015. The Court, in response to the request made, peremptorily fixed the hearing of the petition on the designated date. It was noted that the de-tagging application, which was the subject of the initial discussion, was not pressed before the Court, indicating a focus on expeditiously moving towards the final disposal of the petition.

In conclusion, the judgment reflects the Court's commitment to ensuring the efficient and timely resolution of the legal matter at hand by facilitating an early hearing and final disposal of the petition through coordinated efforts between the parties and the Court.

---