Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's miscellaneous application seeking recall of the earlier order dismissing its appeal on the ground of low tax effect was liable to be allowed in view of the CBDT's later circular and office memorandum carving out an exception for cases involving bogus long-term capital gains through penny stocks.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the earlier dismissal of the appeal had been based on the monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT circulars. On examining the later circular and office memorandum, it found that cases involving bogus long-term capital gains through penny stocks were expressly placed in the exceptional category to the monetary limit policy. Since the present appeal fell within that category, the earlier order could not stand.
Conclusion: The miscellaneous application was allowed and the earlier order was recalled, with the appeal directed to be listed for hearing on merits.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal reopened the Revenue's appeal and restored it for regular adjudication, holding that the monetary-limit restriction did not apply to the case.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later CBDT instruction expressly excludes a class of cases from the monetary-limit regime, an appeal earlier dismissed solely for low tax effect may be recalled and restored for hearing on merits.