IGST Refund Granted: Appeal Recognized for Compliance and Correction of Initial Application Error.

The Additional Commissioner allowed the appellant's appeal for the IGST refund of Rs. 1,15,167, acknowledging a technical error in the refund application process. Despite initial rejection by the adjudicating authority, the appeal was granted based on the appellant's compliance with refund procedures and proper declaration of the IGST amount, thereby sanctioning the refund.

---

---

Issues:
Refund claim of IGST paid on input/input service rejected by adjudicating authority. Appellant filed appeal against the order citing technical error in entering IGST amount, non-consideration of submitted invoices, and arbitrary rejection of refund without merit assessment.

Analysis:
1. Refund Claim and Rejection: The appellant, a UIN entity, filed a refund claim of Rs. 18,05,340 for CGST and SGST/UTGST for the quarter July-September 2017. The adjudicating authority sanctioned the refund for CGST and SGST/UTGST but rejected the IGST refund claim of Rs. 1,15,167 as the appellant did not claim it in their refund application.

2. Appellant's Grounds for Appeal: The appellant contended that due to a technical error, they could not enter the IGST amount separately and claimed it under CGST and UTGST. They argued that the adjudicating authority did not consider the invoices submitted by them, as per various Board Circulars, and the refund rejection was arbitrary without a proper assessment of the case.

3. Analysis of Technical Error: The appellant submitted that they correctly declared the IGST amount in the 'Statement of Invoices' but could not enter it separately in Form GSTR-11 due to a technical glitch. They provided invoices showing IGST payments, supporting their claim for the IGST refund.

4. Legal Precedents and Decision: The Additional Commissioner analyzed the case, referring to legal precedents. Citing the Madras High Court case and Allahabad High Court case, it was held that technical glitches should not hinder legitimate refunds. As the appellant correctly mentioned the IGST amount in the 'Statement of Invoices' and due to being a UIN entity eligible for IGST refunds, the Additional Commissioner allowed the appeal for the IGST refund of Rs. 1,15,167.

5. Final Order: Considering the technical error and the appellant's compliance with the refund procedures, the appeal was allowed, and the IGST refund of Rs. 1,15,167 was sanctioned to the appellant. The order disposed of the appeal accordingly.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented by the parties, legal interpretations, and the final decision rendered by the Commissioner of GST (Appeals) in Chandigarh.

---