Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate court could grant an interim injunction in the absence of applicability of Order 39, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: An interim injunction in appellate proceedings can be granted only if it falls within the scope of Order 39, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court has no inherent power in appellate jurisdiction over mofussil proceedings to issue an injunction merely on considerations of equity and good conscience. Where the decree under challenge remains operative, the court cannot restrain a successful party from proceeding in accordance with that decree unless the statutory conditions for injunction are satisfied.
Conclusion: The appellate court had no jurisdiction to grant the injunction.
Ratio Decidendi: A court exercising appellate jurisdiction cannot grant an interim injunction unless it is authorized by Order 39, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; inherent powers cannot be invoked to bypass that limitation.