Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be assessed in the hands of the recipient company when the payment was received from a person other than the shareholder.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the recipient of the loan was not the shareholder from whom the amount was received. It followed the jurisdictional High Court view, consistent with the Delhi High Court's decision, that the deeming fiction in section 2(22)(e) operates only where the payment is received by a shareholder of the payer company. Where the payment is received from a non-shareholder, the provision cannot be invoked against the recipient company merely because the payment may otherwise fall within the description of accumulated profits.
Conclusion: The addition under section 2(22)(e) was rightly deleted and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) cannot be taxed in the hands of a recipient who is not a shareholder of the payer company.