Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal against the advance ruling was maintainable in the absence of filing in the prescribed form and payment of the prescribed fee.
Analysis: The appeal was required to be presented in Form GST ARA-02 and accompanied by the prescribed fee under Rule 106 of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with Section 49 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The appellant did not comply with these mandatory requirements despite being called upon to do so. Since the procedural requirements for invoking the appellate advance ruling jurisdiction were not satisfied, the appeal could not be entertained and the merits of the dispute were not examined.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Compliance with the prescribed statutory form and fee is mandatory for maintaining an appeal before the appellate advance ruling authority, and non-compliance renders the appeal liable to rejection without consideration of merits.