Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods supplied from the Pathredi unit to the Chennai unit, being parts and sub-parts sent in unassembled condition for further assembly and processing, were classifiable under Chapter 86 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 so as to attract the concessional GST rate applicable to railway goods.
Analysis: The goods dispatched from Pathredi were found to be parts and sub-parts rather than complete sub-assemblies. The Chennai unit was to undertake substantial operations including assembly, welding, painting, testing, inspection, and addition of components procured from other suppliers. On this factual basis, the supply was not treated as merely unassembled presentation of a complete or finished article. The interpretative guidance under Rule 2(a) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Harmonized System, which treats complete or finished articles presented unassembled or disassembled as classifiable with the assembled article, was held inapplicable because the Chennai process involved further assembly and manufacturing activity. The circular clarifying that only goods classifiable under Chapter 86 supplied to Railways attract the concessional rate was also applied.
Conclusion: The goods supplied from the Pathredi unit to the Chennai unit could not be classified under Chapter 86 and were liable to the general applicable rate according to the classification of each item in its respective chapter.