Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment of the same income in the status of an unregistered firm was lawful when the members had already been assessed and taxed on that income in their individual or beneficiary capacity.
Analysis: The earlier assessments on the footing of a trust and beneficiaries were found to be unsustainable, and the reopening was made after the legal position was clarified. Once the prior assessments ceased to have effect, the principle against double taxation could not apply unless two valid assessments simultaneously survived. Reassessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was therefore permissible where the firm had not been taxed in its correct status and the original assessment had proceeded on a wrong basis. The bar against taxing the same income twice does not prevent a fresh assessment when the earlier assessment is set aside or treated as ineffective.
Conclusion: The reassessment of the firm as an unregistered firm was valid and the question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: The rule against double taxation is not attracted where the earlier assessment on a wrong or invalid basis no longer subsists and the same income is lawfully assessed afresh in its correct hands or capacity.