Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (11) TMI 1550 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal adjusts interest on receivables, excludes comparables, no TP adjustment needed. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the TPO to reconsider the interest on receivables issue and excluding five contested companies from the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal adjusts interest on receivables, excludes comparables, no TP adjustment needed.

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the TPO to reconsider the interest on receivables issue and excluding five contested companies from the list of comparables. As the assessee's profit margin was above the Arm's Length price, no TP adjustment was necessary. The final decision was issued on 20th November 2019.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Selection of Comparable Companies by the TPO.
                            2. Arm's Length Adjustment towards Interest on Delayed Trade Receivables.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Selection of Comparable Companies by the TPO:

                            The assessee, a private limited company engaged in software development services, filed its return for AY 2014-15. The TPO conducted a fresh search for comparable companies and selected 12 companies, computing the Arm’s Length margin at 34.31%. The assessee contested the inclusion of five companies: E-Infochips Limited, Thirdware Solutions Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, Infosys Limited, and Persistent Systems Limited, arguing they were functionally dissimilar.

                            - E-Infochips Limited:
                            - Engaged in IT services, ITES, and product-based activities without segmental details.
                            - Involved in R&D activities, earning super-profits, and benefiting from such activities.
                            - The Tribunal found it functionally dissimilar due to its diverse activities and R&D involvement.

                            - Thirdware Solutions Limited:
                            - Product-based with revenue from product sales and no revenue from services.
                            - Incurred marketing expenses and lacked segmental details.
                            - The Tribunal concluded it was functionally dissimilar due to its product-based revenue and absence of segmental reporting.

                            - Infobeans Technologies Limited:
                            - Engaged in export of goods and services without segmental details.
                            - Had MODVAT and sales tax deposits indicating involvement in goods sales.
                            - The Tribunal found it functionally dissimilar due to its engagement in goods sales.

                            - Infosys Limited:
                            - Underwent extraordinary events like acquisitions impacting profitability.
                            - Turnover of Rs. 42,531 Crs, significantly higher than the assessee's Rs. 163 Crs.
                            - Involved in R&D activities and incurred substantial marketing expenses.
                            - The Tribunal ruled it functionally dissimilar due to its large scale, R&D activities, and extraordinary events.

                            - Persistent Systems Ltd:
                            - Engaged in products, platforms, and services with R&D activities.
                            - Lacked segmental details and had intangible assets.
                            - The Tribunal found it functionally dissimilar due to its diverse revenue streams and absence of segmental data.

                            The Tribunal excluded these five companies from the list of comparables. The final list of comparable companies included Tata Elxsi Ltd (Seg), Mindtree Ltd, R S Software (India) Ltd, Larsen & Turbo Infotech Ltd, and CG-VAK Software & Exports Ltd, with an arithmetic mean of 20.31%. Since the assessee's profit margin of 21.45% was above this Arm’s Length price, no TP adjustment was required.

                            2. Arm's Length Adjustment towards Interest on Delayed Trade Receivables:

                            The TPO proposed an adjustment for interest on trade receivables, considering a 30-day realization period reasonable. The DRP directed the TPO to compute the ALP interest rate considering a 90-day credit period, reducing the TP adjustment from Rs. 2,51,31,511/- to Rs. 1,05,62,753/-.

                            The assessee argued that interest on outstanding receivables is not an international transaction under section 92B and that the company is debt-free. The Tribunal disagreed, stating the amendment to section 92B covers interest on outstanding receivables. However, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's argument to apply the FIFO method for adjusting advances received against receivables and remitted the issue back to the TPO for fresh consideration.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the TPO to reconsider the interest on receivables issue and excluding the five contested companies from the list of comparables. The final decision was pronounced on 20th November 2019.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found