Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 deserved sanction, and whether the statutory and ancillary compliances noted by the Registrar of Companies, the Regional Director, the Official Liquidator, and the Competition Commission of India required refusal of approval.
Analysis: The Scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to the members or creditors or contrary to public policy. The Tribunal noted the statutory requirements concerning the appointed date, transfer of property and liabilities, continuation of proceedings, filing of certified copies with the Registrar of Companies, and compliance with the undertakings furnished by the applicant companies. It also directed compliance with differential stamp duty and fees, and kept open the issue of adjudication for alleged non-compliances under the specified provisions, without affecting sanction of the Scheme. The Scheme was also accepted on the basis that the Competition Commission of India approval was not required, as undertaken by the companies.
Conclusion: The Scheme of Amalgamation was sanctioned, with the appointed date fixed as 1st April 2018 and with directions for compliance with the conditions and undertakings recorded in the order.