TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Subordinate Judge had jurisdiction to deal with the execution application in the absence of an assignment of civil business under Section 13 of the Bengal, North-Western Provinces and Assam Civil Courts Act.
Analysis: Section 13 contemplates that, where two or more Subordinate Judges exercise the same local jurisdiction, the District Judge may assign civil business among them. In the absence of any such assignment, both Subordinate Judges remain concurrently competent to entertain and proceed with execution matters arising within the district. The order under challenge proceeded on an erroneous view that the Subordinate Judge lacked jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The Subordinate Judge had jurisdiction to proceed with the execution application, and the contrary order was unsustainable.
TaxTMI 
