Tribunal dismisses late claim in insolvency case, underscores importance of timely submissions

The Tribunal dismissed the Operational Creditor's application seeking relief to condone the delay in filing claims against the Corporate Debtor after the completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Despite the Operational Creditor's claim of lack of awareness due to communication issues, the Tribunal found their claim untimely as it was not submitted within the prescribed period. Emphasizing adherence to timelines and procedures under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Resolution Professional, highlighting the importance of timely claim submissions in the resolution process.

---

---

Issues:
Delay in filing claims against Corporate Debtor after completion of CIRP.

Analysis:
1. The Operational Creditor filed an application seeking relief to condone the delay in filing their claims against the Corporate Debtor under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Applicant claimed they were unaware of the initiation of the CIRP due to lack of communication and information.

2. The Resolution Professional countered the Applicant's claims, stating that the CIRP had been completed with a Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors. The Respondent highlighted that the Applicant failed to submit their claim within the stipulated time frame and even after being requested to do so by the Resolution Professional.

3. The Resolution Professional provided detailed timelines and actions taken during the CIRP process, including the issuance of public announcements, formation of the Committee of Creditors, and approval of the Resolution Plan. The Respondent emphasized that the Applicant's claim was time-barred and lacked proper submission as per regulations.

4. The Tribunal considered both parties' arguments and examined the rules and regulations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It was concluded that claims by the Resolution Professional can only be admitted within 90 days from the start of CIRP proceedings, upon proper submission in prescribed formats.

5. The Tribunal found that the Applicant had failed to file their claim within the specified period despite reminders from the Resolution Professional. It was noted that the Resolution Professional had fulfilled obligations by issuing public notices for claim submissions, and personal notices to creditors were not mandated.

6. As the CIRP had concluded, and the Resolution Plan approval was pending, the Tribunal deemed the Applicant's application untimely and not permissible at the current stage. Considering all aspects, rules, and the status of the case, the application for condonation of delay in filing claims was dismissed.

7. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Applicant's application, emphasizing the importance of adherence to timelines and prescribed procedures under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in the resolution process.

---